# Any plans to add MQA process in future releases ?

**URL:** <https://forum.psaudio.com/t/any-plans-to-add-mqa-process-in-future-releases/2667>\
**Category:** DACs\
**Created:** [December 3, 2015, 3:54am UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/any-plans-to-add-mqa-process-in-future-releases/2667 "2015-12-03T03:54:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![amolan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/919ad9/32.png) [@amolan](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/amolan)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2015, 3:54am UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/any-plans-to-add-mqa-process-in-future-releases/2667/1 "2015-12-03T03:54:30Z")

</div>

Hi Guys,

Any plans to add MQA process in future firmware releases ?

Thanks,

Alexandre.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dpaananen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/f4b2a3/32.png) [@dpaananen](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/dpaananen)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2015, 6:17am UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/any-plans-to-add-mqa-process-in-future-releases/2667/2 "2015-12-03T06:17:07Z")

</div>

We have been working with the MQA folks, and studying the issues and ramifications. It turns out that implementation is not a no-brainer.

Bottom line is we have not reached a decision point yet, so no promises.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![amolan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/919ad9/32.png) [@amolan](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/amolan)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2015, 3:04am UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/any-plans-to-add-mqa-process-in-future-releases/2667/3 "2015-12-04T03:04:24Z")

</div>

Hi Dave,

Thanks for your feedback.