# MQA Support once Bridge II is EOL

**URL:** <https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864>\
**Category:** Network Audio\
**Created:** [January 20, 2019, 4:31pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864 "2019-01-20T16:31:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![michaelhifi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a5b964/32.png) [@michaelhifi](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/michaelhifi)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2019, 4:31pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/1 "2019-01-20T16:31:19Z")

</div>

Paul what is the plan for MQA support once the Bridge III comes out?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![michaelhifi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a5b964/32.png) [@michaelhifi](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/michaelhifi)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 1:04pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/2 "2019-01-31T13:04:25Z")

</div>

@Paul can I get an answer to MQA support moving forward? Or is there someone on your team who can answer this question?

Thanks

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Paul](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/paul/32/6_2.png) [@Paul](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/Paul)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 2:22pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/3 "2019-01-31T14:22:52Z")

</div>

We have yet to decide. I am leaning towards not including it as to do so requires a good deal or hardware rearranging and, as people know, I believe it is on its last legs and on the way out.

I know this is not going to be popular and we don’t want to let people down, but then too I hate compromising our values.

I wonder how many people really care.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![michaelhifi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a5b964/32.png) [@michaelhifi](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/michaelhifi)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 2:48pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/4 "2019-01-31T14:48:14Z")

</div>

Thanks for your reply. I personally want MQA support as I’m a Tidal user and Tidal offers MQA. I’m sure you will get some who say they don’t want it and some who say they do.

Again thanks for your reply.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![amsco15](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/amsco15/32/28_2.png) [@amsco15](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/amsco15)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 2:48pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/5 "2019-01-31T14:48:20Z")

</div>

I, for one, don’t care a whit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JeffofArabica](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/jeffofarabica/32/135_2.png) [@JeffofArabica](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/JeffofArabica)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 3:46pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/6 "2019-01-31T15:46:55Z")

</div>

> [@Paul](#):
>
> I wonder how many people really care.

Now this would be good cause for a survey on the forum @Elk

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wijber](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/wijber/32/2164_2.png) [@wijber](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/wijber)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 4:18pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/7 "2019-01-31T16:18:51Z")

</div>

@bootzilla could you start a poll for this 🧐 ?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JeffofArabica](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/jeffofarabica/32/135_2.png) [@JeffofArabica](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/JeffofArabica)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 4:29pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/8 "2019-01-31T16:29:56Z")

</div>

Something simple like…

With regard to purchasing the Octave music server, how important is MQA as a feature:

1. Very Important
2. Neutral
3. Not important

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JeffofArabica](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/jeffofarabica/32/135_2.png) [@JeffofArabica](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/JeffofArabica)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 4:32pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/9 "2019-01-31T16:32:39Z")

</div>

Or better yet…

1. Want it
2. Neutral
3. Don’t want it

For those that are absolutely opposed to it

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bootzilla](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/bootzilla/32/1598_2.png) [@bootzilla](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/bootzilla)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 4:45pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/10 "2019-01-31T16:45:53Z")

</div>

**POLL: Should PS Audio include MQA Decoding in the Upcoming Bridge III and Octave Music Server?:**

_Poll ([view on site](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/10))_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![michaelhifi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a5b964/32.png) [@michaelhifi](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/michaelhifi)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 4:49pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/11 "2019-01-31T16:49:15Z")

</div>

For me it comes down to will PSA continue to support/develop MQA or not. Given I don’t know the cost of the upcoming Bridge it is hard to judge based on cost increase.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dew1551](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ac91a4/32.png) [@dew1551](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/dew1551)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 4:51pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/12 "2019-01-31T16:51:20Z")

</div>

I don’t care either

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JeffofArabica](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/jeffofarabica/32/135_2.png) [@JeffofArabica](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/JeffofArabica)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 6:10pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/13 "2019-01-31T18:10:30Z")

</div>

@Elk, can you move this poll to its own thread? I think it has value for @Paul and I am afraid it will not get much exposure under this current thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elk](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/elk/32/1240_2.png) [@Elk](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/Elk)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 6:37pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/14 "2019-01-31T18:37:37Z")

</div>

I can, but I suggest closing this poll, and starting two polls - one each for Bridge III and Octave.

I also find the current poll too complicated. I suggest using your first version for each poll:

> [@JeffofArabica](#):
>
> - Want it
> - Neutral
> - Don’t want it

As it stands, I have no idea how to respond as two separate products are included and there are cost variables of which we have no knowledge.

As it is bootzilla’s poll, I will wait to hear from him before moving the current poll if this is his preference.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bootzilla](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/bootzilla/32/1598_2.png) [@bootzilla](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/bootzilla)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 7:06pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/15 "2019-01-31T19:06:51Z")

</div>

Hi, I do not have a strong view either way. On request, I can close the existing poll, create two new polls in this thread, and then the two new ones can be moved as @Elk sees fit. Please let me know. Thanks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![michaelhifi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a5b964/32.png) [@michaelhifi](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/michaelhifi)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 7:12pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/16 "2019-01-31T19:12:53Z")

</div>

Honestly having a poll doesn’t matter to me one way or another. I believe @wijber was the one who suggested the poll.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elk](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/elk/32/1240_2.png) [@Elk](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/Elk)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 9:28pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/17 "2019-01-31T21:28:23Z")

</div>

We need a poll to determine whether there should be a poll.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wijber](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/wijber/32/2164_2.png) [@wijber](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/wijber)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 9:41pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/18 "2019-01-31T21:41:50Z")

</div>

@bootzilla could you start a poll for this? 😂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kerosene](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/kerosene/32/9084_2.png) [@kerosene](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/kerosene)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 9:49pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/19 "2019-01-31T21:49:56Z")

</div>

Wish there were a way for the MQA team to conduct complete unfolding within the TIDAL or Roon software thereby eliminating the need for third parties to be involved.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dirk](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/dirk/32/277810_2.png) [@Dirk](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/Dirk)\
**Post date:** [January 31, 2019, 10:21pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864/20 "2019-01-31T22:21:51Z")

</div>

> [@Elk](#):
>
> We need a poll to determine whether there should be a poll.

We need a poll to determine the worthiness of members who are likely to partake in a poll.

[Next page](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/mqa-support-once-bridge-ii-is-eol/8864.md?page=2)
