# Tempering the preamp frenzy

**URL:** <https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381>\
**Category:** Everything Else\
**Created:** [August 19, 2013, 11:35am UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381 "2013-08-19T11:35:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![edorr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/85e7bf/32.png) [@edorr](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/edorr)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 11:35am UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/1 "2013-08-19T11:35:29Z")

</div>

Before we all start tapping into the kids’ college funds or mortgage our homes to acquire an expensive preamp in the wake of Paul’s recent discovery of its sonic merits, I want to offer a different perspective. .  
  
  
  
First, I wholeheartedly agree that achieving the best sound quality achievable given the current state of technology requires a preamp, and have concluded the same based on trying both routes. However, the issue of what offers the best price/performance is what really matters, and this is far less clear cut.   
  
  
  
Paul just added at least $6,000 MSRP (allowing for some cabling) worth of equipment into the chain and reported an improvement in sound quality. The relevant price/performance question is does his $10,000 DAC + Preamp combo sound better than a $10K DAC with build in volume control?   
  
  
  
While I have not rotated enough gear trough my system to make this call, it is obviously by no means a foregone conclusion that this is the case. I personally have a hunch that using a DAC with volume control will offer the best price/performance (as opposed to absolute performance) in almost all systems, not least because I have found that preamps that beat the DAC VC don’t come cheap (Paul’s $6,000 tubes is the “entry level” in this regard).  
  
  
  
This is a very important issue, because if you do need any of the input switching capabilities of a preamp and use it strictly as an active analog volume control for your digital source, you may indeed be better off spending your money moving up the DAC foodchain, rather then getting an expensive preamp.   
  
  
  
This analysis also has implications for PS audio - if indeed volume control on the DAC still offers the best price/performance, the rational R&D project is trying to engineer improvements into the DAC that elevate PWD mkIII performance to PWD mkII + preamp level at lower cost, or better still, exceed its performance.   
  
  
  
It strikes me that the alternative - trying to develop competitive all analog preamp in the $4k-$6K is a far higher commercial and technical risk. This is because despite its benefits in the very high end, a plain vanilla analog preamp is probably a dwindling product category. All the innovation is happing in integrating music servers, streamers, digital cross-overs and room correction into digital preamps with build in D/A conversion.  
  
  
  
Just some food for though…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madmacs99-2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/958977/32.png) [@madmacs99-2](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/madmacs99-2)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 12:40pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/2 "2013-08-19T12:40:49Z")

</div>

I completely agree about where the innovation is occurring. It might mean audio companies have to change their business models to develop or acquire new capabilities.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mariankiely](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@mariankiely](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/mariankiely)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 1:17pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/3 "2013-08-19T13:17:10Z")

</div>

i’M WITH YOU GUYS ON THIS.  
  
eXCEPT… i WANT IT ALL INSIDE THE BASE OF MY ACTIVE SPEAKERS WITH ONLY A CAT-6 CABLE [AND POWER CORD] RUNNING TO THEM.  
  
DAMN kEYBOADR STUK AGN. NO LOWR?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madmacs99-2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/958977/32.png) [@madmacs99-2](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/madmacs99-2)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 1:22pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/4 "2013-08-19T13:22:10Z")

</div>

Buy meridian

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ryonlunch32](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/9e8a1a/32.png) [@ryonlunch32](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/ryonlunch32)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 1:24pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/5 "2013-08-19T13:24:37Z")

</div>

Hey Gordon… Keyboard’s stuck - you need a tow? Maybe a winch, or better yet a wench? 😃  
  
  
  
J.P.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elk](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex015/user_avatar/forum.psaudio.com/elk/32/1240_2.png) [@Elk](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/Elk)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 4:55pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/6 "2013-08-19T16:55:02Z")

</div>

Very thoughtful, Edorr.   
  
  
  
Determining the yuck per buck ratio is always tricky.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![birddogthecat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ce7236/32.png) [@birddogthecat](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/birddogthecat)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 5:11pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/7 "2013-08-19T17:11:51Z")

</div>

@Gordon Why is this thread in “Tagging?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madmacs99-2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/958977/32.png) [@madmacs99-2](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/madmacs99-2)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 5:25pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/8 "2013-08-19T17:25:30Z")

</div>

@edorr - as I mentioned in the preamp thread, it may be the case that the sonic gains from putting the preamp in the chain is less informative about the PWD going direct and more informative about the new amp under development. Another test would be to get an amp of the same type where going direct is the preferred route, and pairing it up with the new preamp - does that make the same improvement?  
  
  
  
It could be that class D amps are not worth listening to without tubes in front of them \>:)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![edorr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/85e7bf/32.png) [@edorr](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/edorr)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 6:28pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/9 "2013-08-19T18:28:52Z")

</div>

> @edorr - as I mentioned in the preamp thread, it may be the case that the sonic gains from putting the preamp in the chain is less informative about the PWD going direct and more informative about the new amp under development. Another test would be to get an amp of the same type where going direct is the preferred route, and pairing it up with the new preamp - does that make the same improvement?  
>   
> It could be that class D amps are not worth listening to without tubes in front of them \>:)

  
  
 I seriously doubt this. I spend a lot (too much) time on the forums, and folks that try a high grade preamp consistently report sonic improvements, irrespective of upstream or downstream components. I for one own class A monoblocks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mariankiely](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@mariankiely](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/mariankiely)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 8:27pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/10 "2013-08-19T20:27:41Z")

</div>

> Buy meridian

  
  
 Have you ever listened to them?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madmacs99-2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/958977/32.png) [@madmacs99-2](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/madmacs99-2)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 10:05pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/11 "2013-08-19T22:05:30Z")

</div>

Not in a while. I found them to be a bit crunchy sounding. Not quite my preference. But I would welcome another listening session.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madmacs99-2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/958977/32.png) [@madmacs99-2](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/madmacs99-2)\
**Post date:** [August 19, 2013, 10:08pm UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/12 "2013-08-19T22:08:23Z")

</div>

@edorr - yes that is the pattern and it is consistent with my experience. So we agree about that. What I am less sure about is whether there are too many variables at play in Paul’s set up. It will be interesting to see how the listening progresses, especially If other sources and amps are rotated through one by one in a controlled way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mariankiely](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b5e925/32.png) [@mariankiely](https://forum.psaudio.com/u/mariankiely)\
**Post date:** [August 20, 2013, 6:31am UTC](https://forum.psaudio.com/t/tempering-the-preamp-frenzy/381/13 "2013-08-20T06:31:43Z")

</div>

> David said: in a controlled way

  
  
 =))
