Ted Smith saidTed - I agree completely. The end SE-DS product maybe worse, no significant change (+ or -), amazing, or just different. I told the RUSTy group what I was comfortable doing and what I did not want to undertake. The GWU professor choose the modifications and where he suggested to apply them.Everything is built at a price point so I do believe that you can get good value from appropriate modifications.
I cannot stress enough that there are absolutely NO investors in this project aside from the principles. There is not even a remote possibility of anyone getting financially hurt. Why this fact does not assuage the naysayers I do not understand. Bottom line for PSA is that there is a distant possibility they may sell a few additional DS units. Who knows? Rick Cullen, Cullen Circuits, preformed outstanding PSA mods. Of course, he designed some of the circuits so he literally had inside knowledge.
At this point, I am just glad that the DS works: “First do no harm.” In other words, I did not screw-up mechanically. You never know until you plug it in and hold your breath.
Working inside the DS is fairly easy. There is ample real estate and the modular architecture makes for easy access. Modifying phono stages such as Jasmine, Einstein, WEST, and others was considerably more difficult. The hardest part regarding the DS was the use of a pin-vise to enlarge board holes to accept the wider girth of the tails.
Anyway, I should have some observations from the RUSTy Golden Ears by the time Diane & I return from Palo Alto on the 29th.
Today, I add in the Vishay’s (where prescribed), test, and pack up for FedEx. (I love the Oxford comma.)
NB: I will ask RUSTy if I can send you some high resolution photos of the work. It is neat & tidy and, yes, I am somewhat proud. Photos are not for posting on the Forum but share as you wish among your peers.