According to a nationally “renown” men’s journal the following represents the finest available in vinyl playback. I guess they did not consider checking in with Michael Fremer.
![]()
According to a nationally “renown” men’s journal the following represents the finest available in vinyl playback. I guess they did not consider checking in with Michael Fremer.
![]()
Wow, that is the worst of the worst!
I saw that “Angel’s Horn” setup advertised on Facebook, and their copy called it “high-end” sound. I posted an objection to that, saying it had a specific meaning in audio, and their product ain’t it, and I got dumped on big-time by other posters, claiming I was being a jerk.
There are three in there that could be considered meaningful starter turntables IMO. You pick… ![]()
I always think of Esquire first when considering my next analog playback purchase. ![]()
Yikes! Hopefully we won’t see a fashion section in Stereophile soon.
Well they said „for retro listening“, so I’d say they are not really wrong ![]()
Even today quite some vinyl listeners (and vinyl haters) still think, listening to vinyl means to pile up as many artifacts and potential weaknesses as possible to then have a „pleasant“, too thick, muddied and recessed sound to be able to halfway enjoy even the worst, most bass shy and brightest recordings ![]()
Perhaps the inappropriate “echo chamber”? ![]()
I’ve had more than a few recently ask for recommendations regarding a starter turntable for a graduation gift. Most take a pass on the recommendation and pick-up a cheap one, Crosley comes to mind.