Any comments on this article? :-/
http://xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
I have read and article like this before. I do not understand how one side says one thing and the other the opposite. All I do know is if you take a good ref recording at 24/192 and down sample below 24/96 you can hear it . And below 16/44 it really starts to get grainy. So no answer here .
Al
We have seen this article several times and it makes no more sense today than it did before. It is written with a particular slant and makes assumptions that may not be true for most systems. The author also carefully ignores any assumptions or data that would contradict his opinion.
J.P.