I’m waiting on delivery of a new pair of M700s to put with my existing SGCD. Connecting them will be the first opportunity I’ve ever had to utilize balanced cables if I want.
I know the preferred amp setup is to place them near the speakers, with longer interconnects than speaker cables, but my room won’t allow that. Consequently, my cable runs from preamp to amps will never exceed a half-meter, if that much. So my question is with such a short cable length is there still an advantage to going balanced, whether in sound quality or any other performance criteria?
Sure, the soundstage just seemed to open up and everything was more relaxed and at ease. It’s kind of like looking through a mosquito net and then having it removed.
With true balanced gear, even running short runs, balanced is VERY recommended. Common mode rej might not be as relevant, but the 6db boost you get over SE is.
I have both, from Iconoclast. My amp/preamp are dead quiet.
In my case, RCA sounds better. I don’t see any value in the extra gain. I adjust the volume control.
As usual, it depends on your setup and I would suggest you ignore sweeping statements and judge for yourself.
Same setup into Klipsch RF7-III’s when I went to balanced from admittedly lesser quality RCA I liked the soundstage better especially and the sound generally seemed cleaner. Dead quiet with either. Now with Focal 948’s it’s same but better.
Hi aiki14…I have Focal 948s as well…and find that with balanced
there is so much more 3d imaging and width, depth to the soundstage
as well as verticality.
If you don’t need the 6 dB gain boost single-ended (RCA) could offer better SQ. Even “true balanced” interconnect schemes are never perfectly balanced (inverted and non-inverted signals are not identical). Plus you’re going through more electronics/transformers, etc. with balanced.
The transparency of these 948s is amazing…
Also the fast response to transient attacks and decays…
So blessed to have these ladies sing their Arias for me!!