Yes, my initial hope was to have the iMac act as a NAS, with the files stored on its external drive. As far as the quality issue is concerned, I’m not entirely sure if Airplay is involved or not. It was with the Node, for sure, since the only way I could play the iTunes library through the Node was for the phone to retrieve the files via Wifi, and then push them to the Node via Airplay. With the Aurender, I’m not sure. It’s largely academic, though, because either way, anything stored by iTunes is going to be limited to 16/44.1 even if it’s been ripped as AIFF or just a straight-up copy of the disc’s WAV files. Consequently, I don’t usually listen that way unless it’s for those relatively few albums I bought from the iTunes store. They come with copy protection that limits you to 4 or 5 copies (I think), and I have some that have been copied or burned to disc often enough, the only way they still play is through iTunes. So in those cases, I’ll send content to the Aurender from that library and just live the with sound I get.
I’ve heard definite improvements as the system has evolved, but i’s tough to attribute specific changes to the use of the Aurender. For starters, well before I got the Aurender, I switched from the Node’s internal DAC to the one in my Stellar Gain Cell, which was an eye-popping, night-and-day improvement in clarity, contrast and dynamics. So what I hear now, with the Aurender, is surely at least in part due to the better DAC (though I’ve also since moved on to a used DSD Jr that I picked up from The Music Room). Plus, considering that 99% of what I listened to through the Node was content pushed to it through Airplay, it’s not a real apples-to-apples comparison to the current setup.
The best I can do is tell you that right now I’m extremely happy with my sound, and in my current setup (Aurender and Perfectwave SACD transport as digital sources, the DSD Jr DAC, the Stellar Gain Cell preamp, M700 amps, Maggie .7s with a pair of REL T/7x subs), When I compare the Aurender to the PSA transport, I hear only the subtlest improvements in transparency with the transport. And that holds whether I’m comparing CDs to their rips, or comparing DSD discs with their copied files. But I have to stress that those differences are about as tiny as can be and still be discernable, to the point that most people would probably say they’re identical. How much of that apparent closeness in quality is due to objectively comparable performance, or how much might be the result of the resolving limits of my system (or of my ears) masking bigger differences, I can’t say.