As I explore new music, of course I’m always on the lookout for recommendations of recordings that fit into the category of “audiophile.” This is actually new for me - in the past, my search was for creative, innovative, historically interesting, technical and interpretive talent, unique approaches to sound color and rhythm, etc., and if I happened upon something that had those kinds of things PLUS being a well-engineered recording, all the better. But now that I’m focusing more on recording quality itself, I’m noticing two surprises: first, something I’ve mentioned here before, that I had always thought most audiophiles didn’t really care so much about musicianship - that all they really wanted is to focus on the quality of the RECORDING itself. I have been delighted to find that most people who are really into the audio quality are also really into the music itself as well. In other words, I would not have been surprised if all the suggestions around here had been things I didn’t really care for musically, but I’d listen to just to hear some audiophile-centric characteristics. I’m excited to find this not the case at all.
But the second thing is what I’m writing about here: when I first got started in listening, back in the 1970s, there was definitely a class of recordings that fell clearly under “audiophile” - certain classical recordings, rock groups like Pink Floyd and Steely Dan and a handful of more popular music that almost “lucked in” to being a great work of audio art. In those days, something that really sang to audiophile ears was more the exception than the rule. But I am noticing nowadays that the reverse seems to be true - that almost anything I listen to, as long as it is a serious effort, has a lot of what I look for in a good recording - realistic soundstage, good frequency response, clear capture of instruments / voice, presence, dynamic range (depending on genre), and so on.
My guesses as to why this is true - that more often than not I’m impressed with audio quality might be a) better equipment at more affordable prices, b) better training, c) more people (more to choose from), and d) prevalence - the culture is just getting more accustomed to better quality in everything.
I think this is good news because I am discovering how my time and financial investments in high-end audio are paying off more and more often - sure, no matter WHAT quality of recording, I get to hear it better, but I’m also finding that I don’t need to search as hard to find stuff that knocks my ears off.