good day everyone
Just curious does anyone try or use Mogami cable
for professional musician this cable is supposed to be good for 60 feet without losing anything?
Very popular in Japan, for his low capacitance
Anyone use it? Any comment on it?
Thanks for helping
When money was tight and buying a new set of cables meant saving money, I tried various Mogami interconnect cables (RCA and XLR) at the advice of budget-minded audio friends. I donāt remember the model numbers. Mogami hasnāt really changed their cable catalog much over the years, so itās probably similar today as it was then. All the ones I tried were on par with Gotham, Canare, Grimm TPR, and other pro-line budget cables Iāve heard. Mogami Gold was the only Mogami that stood out above this crowd. If money is tight, Mogami and their Mogami Gold are a good buy. For revealing systems, Mogami, like its other pro cable competitors, is going to lack in depth, soundstage, detail, and realism. Youād think pro studios would care about these things, but generally they donāt. Most studios prioritize reliability along with strong, but flexible shielding. Mixing and mastering fixes the rest.
Iāve read many threads in other forums about how pro studio cables are better than more expensive audiophile brand cables. They are not. Not even close in most cases.
Mogami cables and geometries are in their catalog:
A high end cable in a pro studio is probably not going to last long. Same goes with cymbals. 
I have a set of Mogami Gold 2534 that I donāt use. I bought them because I needed a temporary solution while looking for new cables. I also used them in a setup 20 years ago before replacing them then. Recording studios and audiophile playback systems are completely different settings with different priorities.
Basically, compared to something like Audioquest Water (or even King Cobra), the Mogamiās are flat, not dynamic, restricted, lifeless, etc. Thereās really nothing about them that makes them worthwhile. They just donāt sound very good in an audiophile setting, and you can get way better sound for a little more money.
Unless you just need a cheap set of cables for $50 to move the signal, look elsewhere.
And yet āpro cablesā capture all of the nuances in timbre, dynamics, timing, separation, air, etc. audiophiles desperately seek to reproduce.
nope
it is autotune, that does that after using it three time in a row for the same recording
Just kidding!
back then when someone donāt have a voice you add chorus and echo it was the sort of camouflage And then you put the wall of sound from I forgot his name
we donāt use cheap These days,
We say an affordable solution!
With the cost of living rise sky high in Canada I donāt have the choice to be cheap in my purchasing! hahaha!
Iāve been in many studios, listening to playback thru the monitors and Iāve always heard very detailed, useful but sterile sound. Everything in the studio is a purposeful tool in my experience.
wall of sound: Phil Spector
If sterile, why do we so desperately want to capture this sterile sound as āintendedā as it comes from the studio?
All that audiophiles adore is in the recording as it is released. Yet we continually claim pro audio is inadequate, the ADC, cables, amps are meh, etc.
The irony is heavy.
Snake oil and fairy dust fix all ills, real and imaginary!
Sure, but that doesnāt mean studio cables are the best choice for home playback. They just donāt sound as good as a basic set of $150-$250 used Audioquests, let alone more expensive stuff.
used audioquest most of the time if you go on canuckaudiomart or us mart Are in fact fake cable sold on AliExpress!
Branding sold/soul my man
when the price is cheap thereās no need to make fake cause thereās no room to make money!
AQ was just an example of a readily available cable that sounds better, buy whatever makes you happy
makes you happy!
So why does studio cable capture all the nuances, while only expensive specialty cables can reveal these subtleties at home?
I am editing a choral recording I made last Sunday using Mogami and Belden cables (like many of us, I assemble my own). Plenty of nuance, far from sterile, wonderful room sound. The client will be delighted.
As I have previously opined, our recording technology greatly exceeds our ability to reproduce what is in the recording.
This never resonated with me. The studio sound that Iāve experienced is not what I like to listen to at home. One is not better than the other. Itās just personal preference.
Phil Spector
Many state they want their system to sound like the engineers, producer, and artist āintendedā. Whatever this means.
When you refer to studio sound do you mean the feed from a mic(s)? A mix before mastering?