When "AI" stands for Audiophile Introduction

The only thing I love more than great music coming from great recordings is what I can learn from others about what to listen for. I have been listening pretty intently to music for about 60 years, but have taken a much greater interest in recording quality in the past 10 or so years. So I have a LOT of catching up to do!

I am so grateful when someone goes to the troublele of saying more than “Man, this is a killer recording,” like, “Listen to the balance of the brass section, how you can hear every individual instrument across the middle third of the soundstage.” So thank you to all on this forum who have taken the time to educate me and others in what can be quite a difficult hobby.

Yesterday I was visiting a town not far from me and saw a record store selling vinyl. The selection wasn’t great, but I found an Abbey Road half-speed mastered release of Dusty Springfield’s 1969 album Dusty in Memphis. I have read many audiophile reviews deeming this recording as a “must hear,” so I bought it for $29 (which seemed pretty good for an “audiophile must-hear”). So I’m going to play it in a few hours, but decided to ask Google’s basic Gemini AI to give me some things to listen for.

And WOW, did it ever! I think this is a great application of AI - where it can almost instantly check across the web for reviews, posts, etc. and synthesize them into something really helpful.

My question was pretty basic: I just purchased an Abbey Road half-speed mastered vinyl LP of Dusty Springfield album Dusty in Memphis. I understand that this is a high-level audiophile item, so what should I be listening for that makes it special?

It answered: The Abbey Road half-speed mastered version of Dusty in Memphis offers a highly detailed, structurally precise sonic landscape that shifts focus away from raw analog punch toward immense acoustic clarity. Because the vinyl groove was cut at half-speed, the cutting stylus had twice the time to carve intricate high-frequency modulations, resulting in an exceptionally stable and clean presentation.When you spin this specific pressing, focus your listening on the unique way the half-speed process handles the legendary production work of Jerry Wexler, Tom Dowd, and Arif Mardin.

I won’t copy in the whole rest of it, but it goes on to provide details in the following categories:

  • Vocal Intimacy and Treble Extension
  • Soundstage Width and Orchestral Layering
  • Tight, Tactile Rhythm Section
  • Midrange Clarity

It even asked whether I’d like “a track-by-track breakdown of where specific instruments are placed in the stereo field?” I took it up on the offer.

Then it asked about what equipment I was using and I mentioned that recently I noticed some extra sibilance and some skipping on another album and it gave advice and detailed instructions on adjustments to tracking force and anti-skating. It even told me exactly which track I was likely having problems with and it hit the nail on the head!

Don’t worry, I’m not going to just start trusting AI for everything, but knowing that it is compiling some great audiophile-specific information from real people sure makes it useful.

Interesting, I’ll have to give that a try for specific vinyl pressings. I wonder if it scrubs Discogs ratings and comments. With particular pressings Discogs comments have been pretty helpful.

Yeah, I guess you never know exactly what it can “scrub,” but here’s an update: the sibilance is gone and it’s no longer skipping on that track. So AI seems to know what it’s doing as far as “scrubbing” information from people who know what they’re doing. I am co-authoring a book with someone and we have been carefully introducing ourselves to AI, to figure out where it best works for us. What we’ve found is that it is good at helping us “brainstorm” theories that we are coming up with, and also synthesizing opinions on things that are in the “public domain.” We call it the “they” syndrome, as in “they say…”

A.I. = Audiophile Investment

Audiophile Investment is a redundancy.

Audiophile Impoverished is more accurate in my world.