I’ve been asked again, why the super small wires? Isn’t this kind of pointless as the speaker cable DCR is the same as 1313A? Or, in the interconnect the wire DCR and capacitance goes up, isn’t this bad?
The chart below illustrates what the cables do with changes in L and C. As the wire size and capacitance values are changed, we see Vp adjustments taking place.
The Vp, speed of the electromagnetic signals in the wire, CHANGE with frequency until we hit RF (above 1.0 MHz). This is a time based distortion all cables will have in the audio band. We go from “zero” Vp at DC (the signal is always there, it never reverses or alternates) to RF where we hit the liming Vp of the plastic used for the dielectric. At RF the equation is simply Vp = 1/SRT(e). As we go down in frequency we slowly merge into a different equation; Vp = SQRT ((2OMEGA)/(RC)). Notice R and C are in the denominator, and need to go UP to lower Vp at a specific frequency.
We need to make significant design changes utilize many smaller wires. In the IC and speaker cable. Each wire is designed in parallel so each wire sees the total capacitance. But, we INSULATE each of the IC and speaker cable wires so the current is forced to SPLIT between them and we see a much higher DCR through each individual wire, and this is what adjusts the Vp through the audio band.
IC use 4 x 30 AWG with an air spacer to keep them separated, thus we split the current and share the total 17.5 pF/foot capacitance. The IC (pink trace) see little current so we can really cut the wire size to good effect. Yes, capacitance goes UP from 12.5 pF/foot in the GEN 1 digital/analog IC to 17.5 pF/foot in the 4x4 and 1x4 IC, but this is actually a benefit to better align the Vp across audio. The PINK trace is the 4x4 and 1x4 ICONOCLAST trace, with the 24 AWG the Speaker cable.
We are forced to use a LARGER wire in the speaker cable to balance DCR to a low value to mitigate voltage drop across the cable. Notice what I’ve done on the speaker cable, though. I INCREASED the capacitance to 45 pF/foot nominal such that Vp linearity is as good as a 28 AWG IC cable with a 17.5 pF/foot capacitance! The two traces are one on top of the other. The Vp improvement is far, far better benefit than lower capacitance as the first order low pass effect is way above our 20 KHz requirement. We need to keep capacitance reasonably low to be neutral to amplifier circuits, and not cause high frequency oscillations. It is a balance of design attributes. I designed the 24 AWG speaker cable perform and test as well as a 28 AWG IC would!
Better to try to keep the Vp as close to the same (increased coherence, or the same at every frequency). Clearly we can’t do that, but we can IMPROVE the Vp with careful design changes that aren’t really easy to do. The math does tell the story and what ICONOCLASTS is about.
We have a better cables. It can’t sound better if it isn’t actually better. Now we can know we are comparing improvements and what they might do for us. The fundamental tone to the harmonious will stay better aligned and give each instrument a more lifelike sound per the chart below. The changes are real, so now we can compare the performance.
All ICONOCLAST and BAV use the Vp linearity property as much as I can with existing equipment and manufacture. We designed equipment to make the 4x4 and 1x4 IC better, and in use suggests we have improvements in the sound.
So for those that want to know WHY stuff works, here it is.
Best,
Galen
ALL capacitance are 17.5 pF/foot except the ICONOCLAST 24 AWG speaker cable, which is 45 pF/foot.