Hi, I recently bought an AirLens and a Direcstream DAC mk2 to join my older perfect wave transport disc player and am now delighted with the sound of my digital system. I am impressed with how good the sound quality I am getting with streaming through a Roon nucleus one server (stored library and Tidal/Qobuz). However, The PWT still sounds significantly better to me even when comparing a CD rip stored on the nucleus SSD and playing the CD on the PWT (even with HiRes files). I am using Audioquest Vodka HDMI for I2S inputs from both devices into the DSD. Using the AirLens I get the sense that the detail is all there it’s just not being presented as well as from the PWT. A flatter & narrower soundstage with a bit less body. I am considering investing in an Ethernet filter to see if that helps bring the streaming sound quality closer to the PWT. I am looking at the Network Acoustics Eno2. I note Paul advocates against the benefits of audiophile switches/filters etc as the galvanic isolation of the AirLens protects it from network noise. I’m wondering what is the experience of others with an AirLens using Ethernet switches & filters? Have you noticed a benefit in the real world? Cheers. Gino
2 Likes
Yes in my experience Airlens can still be improved with good ethernet cable and audiophile switch - had chance to hear real-world comparison at friends place - after replacing eth cable with AQ Vodka and adding Paul Pang Quad switch the improvement was clearly there
1 Like
Thank you for the feedback. It’s helpful to hear that improvements in the ethernet network can benefit the airlens. I’m going to take the plunge with the Eno2. Network acoustics offer a 60 day return policy so i have that as a backup in case i don’t get an improvement.
2 Likes