Not throwing in the towel, but

Cool thought. I love studio recordings.

1 Like

Yeah, Brahms didn’t write a symphony for playback on hi-fi but an actual studio album is a work of art whose medium is the hi-fi system. Makes sense.

2 Likes

For me, it helps that I’m not a big fan of the large ā€œclassicalā€ orchestral works - when the 17th,18th,19th century composers went large on key modulation in a massed orchestra (because they finally could, post equal-temprement and finer instrument engineering) they just went too large, for my liking :slight_smile:

Gross generalisations going on there of course!

(also helps to explain why the generation raised on this stuff that also heard contemporary/RnB etc. etc. thought the latter was rubbish with it’s concentration on rhythm and melody, and it also feeds into racist white supremacist narratives of ā€œprimitive musicā€, but that’s a whole other debate that I’m not getting into - because I’ve never seen that on this here forum :slight_smile: )

1 Like

That really speaks to how we all get high on different stuff. I can’t get enough of that full late 19th/early 20th century orchestra with all the bells and whistles!

It’s always cool to hear how the very thing that gives me goose bumps turns another person off and sometimes vice-versa.

Enjoying your comments on this thread.

1 Like

Thanks - I can talk nonsense with the best of them :slight_smile:

It’s a shame really because a large orchestra, and also a large pipe organ, both strike me as early iterations of the desire for a multi timbal synthesiser.
Later iterations of course being things like the mellotron, the synclavier, and then the fairlight and all the other samplers that followed (samplers also old hat now).

The orchestra strikes me as unique amongst them in that the various voices/timbres/pipe ranks/sample-banks equivalent are done by humans, with one conductor ā€œplayingā€.