Interesting. I don’t have any objections to Euphony. However, the main reason a lot of people, like me, use Roon is because of its search and classification features, especially for classical.
What’s that like with Euphony? A lot of software provide Tidal, Qobuz etc integration, serve up files to the DAC etc; but for a classical enthusiast with a large local library, it’s search that matters to me.
I too am heavily invested in classical music. I have spent a great deal of time and effort tagging my files so that I can search in ways that work well for me. Some time ago (2–3 years?) I checked out Roon. I found that it used its own metadata and would not work with the tags that I have defined. This was a complete non-starter for me. Perhaps this has changed in the interval, and perhaps Roon’s metadata for classical music has improved. But the system I have works very well.
Thank you for this information. I was not familiar with Euphony. It seems to have lots of useful features, flexibility, and, in my case, I appreciate the ability to work with Bridge II.
I was running Roon ROCK on a NUC and was considering upgrading to Nucleus+ prior to the 2.0 upgrade. I’m one of the ‘disgruntled’, partly due to functionality as I do use my core offline for a week at a time in a location with no internet every month or so. But mostly due to the customer service/responses/attitudes around the release. Not the company I thought I was buying into with a lifetime license 5 years ago.
That said, I’ve been trialing the Innuos Zen MkIII with Sense. Great SQ, and a pretty slick interface, providing most of what I did with Roon. Also has multi-room playback to any UPnP device (including the Sonos speakers I have scattered about). USB to the DSjr sounds awesome.
Transfer was painless, moved about 1200 albums from my NUC to the Zen, very little metadata clean-up, up and running in an afternoon. Not a cheap alternative, but considering I was thinking Nucleus+ anyway, not a bad upgrade in the end.