Neat! A complex machine.
1 Like
Although not a technology, this statement regarding health still trumps any modern protocol or patented medicine based approach to obtaining optimal health.
"Let food be thy medicine, and let medicine be thy food.â
Hippocrates
Of course this excludes mass produced highly processed GMO âfoodsâ grown on depleted soil.
1 Like
Just remember, vinyl in the US has overtaken CDs in sales in 2020, and up 46% from 2019, and sold 27.5M units. Vinyl also saw its biggest sales week EVER the week ending 12/24/20. Still niche?? It all depends on someoneâs definition.
3 Likes
Not at all alike. But, I never said they were the same. What IS the same it that they are both vintage technologies stat are still being embraced. In no way does that imply that the technologies are the same.
She is the Ted Smith of Fiber???
The market for mechanical watches, vintage, used and new is much bigger than you might imagine.
1 Like
Remember vinylâs ability to compete head to head with its modern technological counterpart. This is critical in my positing vinyl occupies a unique spot. I cannot think of a similar old technology which does this.
To your separate point, vinyl remains niche in terms of how we listen to music. Streaming has taken over. But vinyl occupies a relatively broad niche encompassing both enthusiasts as well as the hip.
1 Like
Again, the critical distinction between vinyl and mechanical watches is mechanical analog watches cannot compete with modern technology in their primary role as timekeepers. Vinyl can compete with its most modern counterpart. Amazing actually.
And while there is continuing interest in mechanical watches, this interest pales in comparison to vinyl.
Vinyl appears to be a singular unicorn.
1 Like
Pretty much. Then add cultivating orchids.
1 Like
Your point is understood and not disputed. Mechanical watch enthusiasts will place particular value on a watchâs movement if itâs acknowledged as superior. But Iâve never heard or been engaged in conversations about timekeeping accuracy as a measure of value.
For track events or making a soufflĂ©, Iâll use my iphone or Apple watch.
All that said, I do agree about vinyl.
I canât comment on the newest generation of digital watches, but when I sold them, they could be less accurate that the best mechanical ones. The best mechanicals are accurate to 4-5 seconds a day. I remember when I was selling then, digital watched were sometimes off several times that. Iâd take the back off, put it on a machine that registered the oscillatorâs frequency, use a special tool that let me adjust the trim for the oscillator, then put the back on. I was very good at that. Now, my eyesight up close is crappy, and my hands are worse due to my neuromyopathy and dupuytrenâs disease. But Hallelujah, my hearing is doing great. Whoo-hoo!!
4 Likes
those were my momâs favorite flower.
I agree with the watch example (âexample,â not âanalogyâ just for Al). Elk gotta take a wider view. Vinyl cannot compete on noise floor with digital but that is only one small aspect of sound quality. Similarly, nobody who wears mechanical watches cares if they lose/gain one (or five or ten) second per day, even if the Casio wonât lose a second over a month. That is missing the point of mechanical watches, just as focusing only on measurement or noise floor is far from the end all in vinyl judging
2 Likes
My impression is a watchâs movement can be superior in a number of ways; accuracy, aesthetics/appearance of the components, layout, action transmitted to the hands, sound, etc. I have been shown some watches which were fascinating.
1 Like
So, who among you is into 8-track? 
3 Likes
The thing with vinyl is in order for it to compete with modern day digitalâŠthe playback system its played upon has to be up to the task of making it sound as good as it can also. So it really canât stand on its own without modern technology being involved in the analogy given. The vinyl part alone does not make the medium whole without other parts being involved in the process. Any album played on an archaic system is not high end by any stretch of the imagination.
1 Like
Very true.
I noted in the past how recording technology greatly surpassed the playback equipment of the day. While the gap is narrowing, we are still better at recording than playback.
Yeah, I realize thereâs an unusual relationship with PSA relying on one person who isnât even a regular employee. But thatâs up to PSA and customers shouldnât need to worry about an internal detail like that.
Btw Ted, you are amazing. I briefly looking into FGPA programming out of curiosity and canât imagine dealing with that.
I sincerely hope that all goes well over weekend at PSAudio so that we all can get the now long-awaited new firmware. It would be kind of⊠nice!
1 Like
I would say quality related your statement is correct (you need a high quality turntable). Time related Iâd say you can take the right and best 30 year old turntable and arm, maybe a little later cartridge, and you can have 80-90% of the quality of the best of todayâs turntables up to 50-100k.
Thatâs why vinyl folks never understood the CD hype and those who thought itâs better by thenâŠbecause those vinyl folks know more or less todayâs vinyl sound since decades.
3 Likes