Stack Audio AUVA Isolators

Stack Audio is a UK based company pioneering in vibration management, streaming products and ethernet isolation.

This post concerns their various acoustic isolators, which fall under the rubric of AUVA or Audio Vibration Absorption, of which they say:

This technology… “harnesses the power of Particle Impact Dampening which eliminates vibrations across a broad frequency range, unveiling remarkable clarity in musical recording. The vibrations excite the particles, creating movement and collisions that dissipate the energy virtually instantaneously. Think of it like throwing a ball into soft sand -the sand absorbs the energy from the ball, preventing it bouncing.”

Today my audiobuddy Marc (who is also becoming a good buddy in general), came over to do some listening.

He knows my system and room very well, and today he was quite impressed by the sonic impact of the Stack Audio AUVA Isolators under my electronics (versus the prior Isocaoustics Oreas), and the Stack AUVA 70s under my speakers (versus the prior Herbies Titanium Speaker Gliders).

Marc and I agreed that the Stack Audio Isolators were clearly superior across the board, particularly in terms of presenting an exceptional level of clarity and naturalness, improved soundstage-width and -depth (in this regard, perhaps most notably in the far rear corners of the stage), the organization and air surrounding individual players on that stage, dynamics macro and micro, bass extension and impact that you can feel in your chest, together with a sense of absolute quiet–yet without a hint of darkness–rendering instrumental decays that seem to go on forever, at least until clearly truncated by the mix.

One caution that one might not think to extend to isolators: it takes some time for the magic powder in each isolator to settle–not so much a break-in process, but a settle-in process which can be hastened a bit by a horizontal shake and a few taps on a horizontal surface.

Happy boy!

4 Likes

I’m a big fan, have 11 sets under all my components plus 100s under my FR20 speakers, they have transformed my system to a level of enjoyment I didn’t think was possible, highly recommended!

3 Likes

I also am a fan and have sets under all the components in my main system except for my turntable (which seems to like the VooDoo IsoPods a bit more perhaps). Great products! Did not know about “encouraging the particles to loosen up”–interesting!

2 Likes

I’m also excited about the positive influence the Stack Audio Auva and EQ’s have. I like the idea of ​​using a thick sheet of acrylic for the amplifiers. A good alternative to wood or granite stone. Greetings Andreas

2 Likes

Under several of my components I use Himalayan salt blocks intended for cooking. They are inexpensive and utterly non-resonant. The downside is that they come in a limited number of sizes and I have no idea about how I would go about cutting them to size. For example, I use two salt blocks 12" x 8" x 2 1/2 inches thick, then the Stack AUVA EQs under my ZENith Mk3 server/streamer.

I went 2 1/2" cast thick acrylic under my AGD Gran Vivaces because they are 12" x 12" and I couldn’t find a suitable salt block alternative…

1 Like

That’s a lot of footers under a pair of speakers! :rofl:

3 Likes

All joking aside. I have to say I’m very interested in the stack audio products. One person has already mentioned improvement with them in the Gryphon powerzone thread. I’m a Isoacoustic user I have Gaia 1’s for speakers and Orea Bronze under my streamer. My speakers don’t have a traditional cabinet or woofers so I feel the Gaia 1’s benefit is minimal. My interest is in the AUVA EQ for component isolation. After watching Han’s review I’m very intrigued for sure! I trust Han’s opinions and feel his taste are similar to my own. The way he describes the stack audio AUVA EQ is surprising to me for a very modestly priced ($225 per set of 4) upgrade. I hope to contribute to this thread soon!

4 Likes

I replaced twelve Orea Bronze with the Stack EQs for a very nice improvement. Today I ordered six more for my AirLens and my new PowerCell 8 SX…

3 Likes

Taking a look at these as well.

Which is the best version for putting under the Grimm MU2 as a set of four? Would that be the CSA-1?

1 Like

Looks as if it weighs just under 10 pounds, so I would say a set of 3 CSA-1 would be appropriate. I would use three, and set them against the bottom of the component, not the feet–in every instance I have tried, contact with the bottom of the chassis is more effective than under component feet, and I think four is overkill for this component.

3 Likes

CSA-1 is the one I use for MU2. In fact I used CSA-2 first then had to change to 1 because 2 dampened the sound too much.

3 Likes

I went with a set of three CSA 1 for under the Grimm, and a set of three CSA 2 for under the Rowland Continuum S2 integrated.

They’ve already shipped!

2 Likes

I have four under my MU2 as it is a weird box with odd weight distribution. Most of the weight seems to be towards the rear so I have two at the back, and two in the middle. I would like to put a big weight on top of it but the control disc makes that difficult. Someone should make a sell a weighted object that is the size and shape of the top of the MU2 with a nice hole to allow the control disc to work. If it could be made from Trans Unicorn horns and bee very expensive that would be perfect.

2 Likes

Interesting. The word I got from Josh at Stack Audio was that, at least for floor standing speakers, the bigger you go in the AUVA the better it’s supposed to get (IOW, it doesn’t work like Isoacoustics which are “weight driven”). I wonder why then using an AUVA 100, for example, on maybe a light floor stander wouldn’t over damp it?

Josh told me to use AUVA 100 for FR30, and it turned out to have excellent result in my system. In fact, AUVA 100 made a bigger improvement than EQ. He said for speakers there is no weight-limit for AUVA 50. 70. and 100. It is a matter of looks and level of improvement.

However, EQ is designed for components and weight limited is quite sensitive compared to other footers (I used Orea Indigo which has a higher rating than necessary for PSA gears before). Electronic gears need different vibration control from speakers would be my guess.

Have you installed the fuse box yet or is your attention on something else still?

3 Likes

What does over-damped sound like?

Has someone compared to EVPs ?

a sort of dead, less live, and a strong urge of needing whiskey.

5 Likes

I’m in the final stages of integrating my sub (there, at least I let something slip! :grin:). My best audio bud is coming over on Monday so we can both make a final assessment, or tweaking, as the case may be*. Once that’s done, the SDFB is next. I’m going right to the graphene with that one! :smiley:

*I think I’ve covered ever free square inch of my listening room moving that thing around! :hot_face:

1 Like

The AUVA EQs are weight sensitive because they have a silicone damper in addition to the particle damping they have in common with the speaker isolators.

What’s also nice about the EQs is that unlike the Isoacoustics, higher capacity versions of the EQs aren’t more expensive.

I believe that if a system change dictates a different weight rating, the silicone damper can be changed. This latter point needs confirmation however…

4 Likes